Nicolas Kicker vs Sebastian Gima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Nov at 11:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Kicker vs S. Gima

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kicker 1 - 0 Gima
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolas Kicker winning 2 and Sebastian Gima winning 0. The last match between Nicolas Kicker and Sebastian Gima was at the Lima 3 Challenger, 02-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Nicolas Kicker getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kicker | 1 |
| Gima | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Lima 3 Challenger(11-02-25)
N. Kicker vs S. Gima H2H Profile
N. Kicker vs S. Gima Match Preview:
- Nicolas Kicker has slightly outperformed Sebastian Gima in second serve points over the past 6 months, with a success rate of 44.61% compared to Gima's 42.98%. Could this give Kicker an edge in the match? It could certainly play a role in the outcome.
- On return games, Gima has proven to be more effective against opponents' second serves, winning 48.70% of those points, whereas Kicker stands at 46.22%.
- Looking at first serve return stats, both players have nearly identical performance, with Kicker at 30.69% and Gima at 30.54%.
- Under pressure, Kicker has a slight advantage in saving breakpoints—51.3% compared to Gima's 50.12%—which could be crucial in tight situations.
- Overall match performance over the past year favors Kicker, who has a 62.34% win rate, while Gima's is 54.79%.
- Kicker excels on clay surfaces with a 60% win rate, suggesting he might have an advantage if the match is on clay.
- Gima has shown his best performance on hard surfaces, also with a 60% win rate, highlighting his preference for these conditions.
- Both players have faced opponents with similar rankings over the past year, with Kicker's opponents averaging a rank of 414.27 and Gima's 416.6.
- In deciding sets, Kicker has demonstrated strong mental resilience, winning 64% of such encounters, while Gima has triumphed in only 48%.
- Kicker has played more matches at the Challenger level, whereas Gima's experience leans more towards the Futures circuit, potentially indicating differing levels of match difficulty faced.
- Analyzing their match statistics is essential, but observing current event form also contributes significantly to predicting outcomes.
Editorial Prediction (November 2, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming match, Nicolas Kicker seems to hold a slight advantage over Sebastian Gima based on their recent performances and statistical comparisons. Kicker's consistency in second serve points and his ability to save breakpoints slightly edge out Gima's efforts in these areas.
While Gima shows strength in returning opponents' second serves, Kicker's overall better win rate and superior performance in deciding sets make him a slight favorite in closely contested situations. Additionally, Kicker's experience on the Challenger circuit suggests he may be more accustomed to higher-level competition.
Considering all factors, including surface strengths and recent form, Nicolas Kicker appears to be the more likely winner of this match against Sebastian Gima.
Nicolas Kicker vs Sebastian Gima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Kicker vs S. Gima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:13:12 | Average Match Time | 1:13:12 |
| 73% (37/51) | 1st Serve % | 62% (32/52) |
| 81% (30/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (20/52) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Kicker Recent Matches Played
S. Gima Recent Matches Played

N. Kicker vs S. Gima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.30% (408/280) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.61% (227/174) |
| 57.36% (927/689) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.98% (502/411) |
| 53.11% (7964/7032) | Games Win/Loss | 52.09% (4415/4060) |
| 53.03% (35/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.42% (58/38) |
| 60.49% (372/243) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.78% (164/130) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 748 | Aces Total | 636 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1055 | Total Double Faults | 1047 |
| 1:15:21 | Average Match Time | 1:32:35 |
| 534.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.09 |
| 65% (21600/33059) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14078/23932) |
| 66% (14150/21600) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (9175/14078) |
| 52% (5911/11459) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4806/9854) |
| 44% (1591/3645) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1258/2834) |
| 42% (14047/33694) | Return Points Win % | 43% (10672/24719) |
| 26.92% (7/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.16% (28/34) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.51% (189/134) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (30/40) |
| 67.68% (178/85) | Futures W/L | 59.52% (197/134) |
| 59% (400/673) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (223/395) |
| 46% (6/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (100/186) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (57/103) |
| 53% (119/225) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (63/115) |
| 85% (406/344) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (211/192) |
| 15% (406/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (211/19) |
| 22% (282/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (190/34) |